↓ Skip to main content

Development of the Feedback Quality Instrument: a guide for health professional educators in fostering learner-centred discussions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of the Feedback Quality Instrument: a guide for health professional educators in fostering learner-centred discussions
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12909-021-02722-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina E. Johnson, Jennifer L. Keating, Michelle Leech, Peter Congdon, Fiona Kent, Melanie K. Farlie, Elizabeth K. Molloy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 5%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 48 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 51 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,185,878
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#310
of 3,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,997
of 429,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#6
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.