You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The ethics of clinical innovation in psychopharmacology: Challenging traditional bioethics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-2-26 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S Nassir Ghaemi, Frederick K Goodwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 24% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 31% |
Psychology | 6 | 12% |
Philosophy | 5 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,185,440
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#154
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,713
of 90,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.