↓ Skip to main content

Measurements of the acid-binding capacity of ingredients used in pig diets

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Veterinary Journal, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measurements of the acid-binding capacity of ingredients used in pig diets
Published in
Irish Veterinary Journal, August 2005
DOI 10.1186/2046-0481-58-8-447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peadar G. Lawlor, P. Brendan Lynch, Patrick J. Caffrey, James J. O'Reilly, M. Karen O'Connell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 53%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Irish Veterinary Journal
#87
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,590
of 68,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Veterinary Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them