↓ Skip to main content

Raman spectroscopy enables phenotyping and assessment of nutrition values of plants: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Raman spectroscopy enables phenotyping and assessment of nutrition values of plants: a review
Published in
Plant Methods, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13007-021-00781-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Z. Payne, Dmitry Kurouski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Engineering 5 8%
Chemistry 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 25 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,976,939
of 23,952,093 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#754
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,901
of 438,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.