You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: a comprehensive review of the CIAO study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-7922-7-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Sartelli, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Ari Leppaniemi, Korhan Taviloglu, Harry van Goor, Pierluigi Viale, Daniel Vasco Lazzareschi, Federico Coccolini, Davide Corbella, Carlo de Werra, Daniele Marrelli, Sergio Colizza, Rodolfo Scibè, Halil Alis, Nurkan Torer, Salvador Navarro, Boris Sakakushev, Damien Massalou, Goran Augustin, Marco Catani, Saila Kauhanen, Pieter Pletinckx, Jakub Kenig, Salomone Di Saverio, Elio Jovine, Gianluca Guercioni, Matej Skrovina, Rafael Diaz-Nieto, Alessandro Ferrero, Stefano Rausei, Samipetteri Laine, Piotr Major, Eliane Angst, Olivier Pittet, Ihor Herych, Ferdinando Agresta, Nereo Vettoretto, Elia Poiasina, Jaan Tepp, Gunter Weiss, Giorgio Vasquez, Nikola Vladov, Cristian Tranà, Samir Delibegovic, Adam Dziki, Giorgio Giraudo, Jorge Pereira, Helen Tzerbinis, David van Dellen, Martin Hutan, Andras Vereczkei, Avdyl Krasniqi, Charalampos Seretis, Cristian Mesina, Miran Rems, Fabio Cesare Campanile, Pietro Coletta, Mirjami Uotila-Nieminen, Mario Dente, Konstantinos Bouliaris, Konstantinos Lasithiotakis, Vladimir Khokha, Dragoljub Zivanovic, Dmitry Smirnov, Athanasios Marinis, Ionut Negoi, Ludwig Ney, Roberto Bini, Miguel Leon, Sergio Aloia, Cyrille Huchon, Radu Moldovanu, Renato Bessa de Melo, Dimitrios Giakoustidis, Orestis Ioannidis, Michele Cucchi, Tadeja Pintar, Zoran Krivokapic, Jelena Petrovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 27% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#454
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,827
of 292,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.