↓ Skip to main content

Comparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced invertebrates and efficiency estimation of genomic sampling in non-model taxa

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative description of ten transcriptomes of newly sequenced invertebrates and efficiency estimation of genomic sampling in non-model taxa
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-9-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Riesgo, Sónia C S Andrade, Prashant P Sharma, Marta Novo, Alicia R Pérez-Porro, Varpu Vahtera, Vanessa L González, Gisele Y Kawauchi, Gonzalo Giribet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Spain 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 215 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 29%
Researcher 64 26%
Student > Master 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 162 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Environmental Science 13 5%
Computer Science 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 26 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,140,047
of 17,165,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#220
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,521
of 261,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,165,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.