You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Free-breathing non-contrast flow-independent cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using cardiac gated, magnetization-prepared 3D Dixon method: assessment of thoracic vasculature in congenital heart disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00788-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander Isaak, Julian A. Luetkens, Anton Faron, Christoph Endler, Narine Mesropyan, Christoph Katemann, Shuo Zhang, Patrick Kupczyk, Daniel Kuetting, Ulrike Attenberger, Darius Dabir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Peru | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,244,775
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#659
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,188
of 446,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.