↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative discussion with patients about delirium risk: are we doing enough?

Overview of attention for article published in Perioperative Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperative discussion with patients about delirium risk: are we doing enough?
Published in
Perioperative Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13741-016-0047-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith H. Tomlinson, Judith S. L. Partridge

Abstract

Postoperative delirium is a common complication in the older surgical population, occurring in 10-50 % of cases. It is thought to be more common if an individual is identified as frail. Postoperative delirium is associated with poor outcome including higher mortality rates, prolonged length of hospital stay, increased care needs on discharge and longer term post-traumatic stress disorder. Guidelines from the American Geriatric Society and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence highlight the importance of risk assessment at the time of the preoperative visit. This enables the perioperative team to plan a care pathway that minimises the risk of delirium occurring postoperatively. Risk assessment also informs a discussion with patient and family regarding their risk, as part of a process of informed patient consent. This is an essential step in conforming to current legal and General Medical Council guidance on the process of consent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,363,264
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#76
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,602
of 348,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.