↓ Skip to main content

The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks

Overview of attention for article published in Life Sciences, Society and Policy, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks
Published in
Life Sciences, Society and Policy, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40504-021-00113-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugen Octav Popa, Mireille van Hilten, Elsje Oosterkamp, Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 194 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 96 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 11%
Engineering 18 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 104 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,701,550
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#95
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,780
of 440,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Life Sciences, Society and Policy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.