↓ Skip to main content

Workers of a drywood termite do not work

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Workers of a drywood termite do not work
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, February 2007
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-4-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith Korb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
France 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#401
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,824
of 91,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.