↓ Skip to main content

Nordic Walking and chronic low back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nordic Walking and chronic low back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-7-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Morsø, Jan Hartvigsen, Lis Puggaard, Claus Manniche

Abstract

Low Back Pain is a major public health problem all over the western world. Active approaches including exercise in the treatment of low back pain results in better outcomes for patients, but it is not known exactly which types of back exercises are most beneficial or whether general physical activity provide similar benefits. Nordic Walking is a popular and fast growing type of exercise in Northern Europe. Initial studies have demonstrated that persons performing Nordic Walking are able to exercise longer and harder compared to normal walking thereby increasing their cardiovascular metabolism. Until now no studies have been performed to investigate whether Nordic Walking has beneficial effects in relation to low back pain. The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether supervised Nordic Walking can reduce pain and improve function in a population of chronic low back pain patients when compared to unsupervised Nordic Walking and advice to stay active. In addition we investigate whether there is an increase in the cardiovascular metabolism in persons performing supervised Nordic Walking compared to persons who are advised to stay active. Finally, we investigate whether there is a difference in compliance between persons receiving supervised Nordic Walking and persons doing unsupervised Nordic Walking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Andorra 1 <1%
Unknown 135 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 40 28%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Sports and Recreations 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,110,122
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,419
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,987
of 67,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.