↓ Skip to main content

Why tocotrienols work better: insights into the in vitro anti-cancer mechanism of vitamin E

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why tocotrienols work better: insights into the in vitro anti-cancer mechanism of vitamin E
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12263-011-0219-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Viola, Francesca Pilolli, Marta Piroddi, Elisa Pierpaoli, Fiorenza Orlando, Mauro Provinciali, Michele Betti, Francesco Mazzini, Francesco Galli

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#147
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,660
of 110,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.