↓ Skip to main content

Ecology of West Nile virus across four European countries: review of weather profiles, vector population dynamics and vector control response

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecology of West Nile virus across four European countries: review of weather profiles, vector population dynamics and vector control response
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1736-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Chaskopoulou, Gregory L’Ambert, Dusan Petric, Romeo Bellini, Marija Zgomba, Thomas A. Groen, Laurence Marrama, Dominique J. Bicout

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) represents a serious burden to human and animal health because of its capacity to cause unforeseen and large epidemics. Until 2004, only lineage 1 and 3 WNV strains had been found in Europe. Lineage 2 strains were initially isolated in 2004 (Hungary) and in 2008 (Austria) and for the first time caused a major WNV epidemic in 2010 in Greece with 262 clinical human cases and 35 fatalities. Since then, WNV lineage 2 outbreaks have been reported in several European countries including Italy, Serbia and Greece. Understanding the interaction of ecological factors that affect WNV transmission is crucial for preventing or decreasing the impact of future epidemics. The synchronous co-occurrence of competent mosquito vectors, virus, bird reservoir hosts, and susceptible humans is necessary for the initiation and propagation of an epidemic. Weather is the key abiotic factor influencing the life-cycles of the mosquito vector, the virus, the reservoir hosts and the interactions between them. The purpose of this paper is to review and compare mosquito population dynamics, and weather conditions, in three ecologically different contexts (urban/semi-urban, rural/agricultural, natural) across four European countries (Italy, France, Serbia, Greece) with a history of WNV outbreaks. Local control strategies will be described as well. Improving our understanding of WNV ecology is a prerequisite step for appraising and optimizing vector control strategies in Europe with the ultimate goal to minimize the probability of WNV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,389
of 5,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,134
of 337,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#83
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.