You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance for improved detection of subendocardial scar: a review of current techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00777-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Holtackers, Caroline M. Van De Heyning, Amedeo Chiribiri, Joachim E. Wildberger, René M. Botnar, M. Eline Kooi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 29% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 26% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,418,166
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#36
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,263
of 446,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.