You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating mechanisms of change in an oral hygiene improvement trial with older adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Oral Health, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12903-021-01701-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean Schensul, Susan Reisine, Apoorva Salvi, Toan Ha, James Grady, Jianghong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 25 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,588,546
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#364
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,386
of 438,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.