You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fast Bayesian inference for gene regulatory networks using ScanBMA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-8-47 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William Chad Young, Adrian E Raftery, Ka Yee Yeung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 32% |
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#315
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,882
of 227,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.