↓ Skip to main content

Conservative oxygen therapy for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative oxygen therapy for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-021-00563-7
Authors

Xiao-Li Chen, Bei-Lei Zhang, Chang Meng, Hui-Bin Huang, Bin Du

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,887,548
of 20,513,123 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#374
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,758
of 339,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,513,123 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them