You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of different deployment strategies for larviciding to control malaria: a simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-03854-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuela Runge, Salum Mapua, Ismail Nambunga, Thomas A. Smith, Nakul Chitnis, Fredros Okumu, Emilie Pothin |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Kenya | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,568,160
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#863
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,054
of 424,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.