You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Technology-supported sitting balance therapy versus usual care in the chronic stage after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00910-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liselot Thijs, Eline Voets, Evelien Wiskerke, Thomas Nauwelaerts, Yves Arys, Harold Haspeslagh, Jan Kool, Patrick Bischof, Christoph Bauer, Robin Lemmens, Daniel Baumgartner, Geert Verheyden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,182,877
of 25,393,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#732
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,636
of 440,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.