You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Onset of effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 infection rates in 176 countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11530-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingo W. Nader, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger, Dana Jomar, Clemens Zauchner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 16% |
| Germany | 6 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 96% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#843,390
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#895
of 17,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,796
of 442,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#30
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.