The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the filtration efficiency and regulatory status of N95s and nontraditional filtering face-piece respirators available during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-021-06008-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Plana, Enze Tian, Avilash K. Cramer, Helen Yang, Mary M. Carmack, Michael S. Sinha, Florence T. Bourgeois, Sherry H. Yu, Peter Masse, Jon Boyer, Minjune Kim, Jinhan Mo, Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Ju Li, Peter K. Sorger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,469,946
of 26,172,861 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#717
of 8,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,087
of 445,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#27
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,172,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.