You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the filtration efficiency and regulatory status of N95s and nontraditional filtering face-piece respirators available during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-021-06008-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Plana, Enze Tian, Avilash K. Cramer, Helen Yang, Mary M. Carmack, Michael S. Sinha, Florence T. Bourgeois, Sherry H. Yu, Peter Masse, Jon Boyer, Minjune Kim, Jinhan Mo, Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Ju Li, Peter K. Sorger |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,112,044
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#587
of 8,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,093
of 423,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#27
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.