Title |
Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12887-019-1898-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margaret L. Lawson, Allyson L. Shephard, Bryan Feenstra, Laura Boland, Nadia Sourial, Dawn Stacey |
Abstract |
Choice of insulin delivery for type 1 diabetes can be difficult for many parents and children. We evaluated decision coaching using a patient decision aid for helping youth with type 1 diabetes and parents decide about insulin delivery method. A pre/post design. Youth and parent(s) attending a pediatric diabetes clinic in a tertiary care centre were referred to the intervention by their pediatric endocrinologist or diabetes physician between September 2013 and May 2015. A decision coach guided youth and their parents in completing a patient decision aid that was pre-populated with evidence on insulin delivery options. Primary outcomes were youth and parent scores on the low literary version of the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Forty-five youth (mean age = 12.5 ± 2.9 years) and 66 parents (45.8 ± 5.6 years) participated. From pre- to post-intervention, youth and parent decisional conflict decreased significantly (youth mean DCS score was 32.0 vs 6.6, p < 0.0001; parent 37.6 vs 3.5, p < 0.0001). Youth's and parents' mean decisional conflict scores were also significantly improved for DCS subscales (informed, values clarity, support, and certainty). 92% of youth and 94% of parents were satisfied with the decision coaching and patient decision aid. Coaching sessions averaged 55 min. Parents (90%) reported that the session was the right length of time; some youth (16%) reported that it was too long. Decision coaching with a patient decision aid reduced decisional conflict for youth and parents facing a decision about insulin delivery method. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
Psychology | 9 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 32 | 48% |