You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of a mobility item bank for older patients in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-10-147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julio Cabrero-García, Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo, Carmen Luz Muñoz-Mendoza, María José Cabañero-Martínez, Lorena González-Llopis, Abilio Reig-Ferrer |
| Abstract |
To develop and validate an item bank to measure mobility in older people in primary care and to analyse differential item functioning (DIF) and differential bundle functioning (DBF) by sex. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
| Psychology | 8 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,158,070
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,125
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,726
of 277,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#50
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.