↓ Skip to main content

Population-based rare variant detection via pooled exome or custom hybridization capture with or without individual indexing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population-based rare variant detection via pooled exome or custom hybridization capture with or without individual indexing
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrique Ramos, Benjamin T Levinson, Sara Chasnoff, Andrew Hughes, Andrew L Young, Katherine Thornton, Allie Li, Francesco LM Vallania, Michael Province, Todd E Druley

Abstract

Rare genetic variation in the human population is a major source of pathophysiological variability and has been implicated in a host of complex phenotypes and diseases. Finding disease-related genes harboring disparate functional rare variants requires sequencing of many individuals across many genomic regions and comparing against unaffected cohorts. However, despite persistent declines in sequencing costs, population-based rare variant detection across large genomic target regions remains cost prohibitive for most investigators. In addition, DNA samples are often precious and hybridization methods typically require large amounts of input DNA. Pooled sample DNA sequencing is a cost and time-efficient strategy for surveying populations of individuals for rare variants. We set out to 1) create a scalable, multiplexing method for custom capture with or without individual DNA indexing that was amenable to low amounts of input DNA and 2) expand the functionality of the SPLINTER algorithm for calling substitutions, insertions and deletions across either candidate genes or the entire exome by integrating the variant calling algorithm with the dynamic programming aligner, Novoalign.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Austria 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 70 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Computer Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,698,265
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,279
of 10,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,690
of 281,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#88
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.