You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation science issues in understanding, collecting, and using cost estimates: a multi-stakeholder perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-021-01143-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andria B. Eisman, Andrew Quanbeck, Mark Bounthavong, Laura Panattoni, Russell E. Glasgow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 40% |
| Australia | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,543,499
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#270
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,117
of 425,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.