↓ Skip to main content

Genetic syndromes screening by facial recognition technology: VGG-16 screening model construction and evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic syndromes screening by facial recognition technology: VGG-16 screening model construction and evaluation
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-01979-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dian Hong, Ying-Yi Zheng, Ying Xin, Ling Sun, Hang Yang, Min-Yin Lin, Cong Liu, Bo-Ning Li, Zhi-Wei Zhang, Jian Zhuang, Ming-Yang Qian, Shu-Shui Wang

Abstract

Many genetic syndromes (GSs) have distinct facial dysmorphism, and facial gestalts can be used as a diagnostic tool for recognizing a syndrome. Facial recognition technology has advanced in recent years, and the screening of GSs by facial recognition technology has become feasible. This study constructed an automatic facial recognition model for the identification of children with GSs. A total of 456 frontal facial photos were collected from 228 children with GSs and 228 healthy children in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from Jun 2016 to Jan 2021. Only one frontal facial image was selected for each participant. The VGG-16 network (named after its proposal lab, Visual Geometry Group from Oxford University) was pretrained by transfer learning methods, and a facial recognition model based on the VGG-16 architecture was constructed. The performance of the VGG-16 model was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation. Comparison of VGG-16 model to five physicians were also performed. The VGG-16 model achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8860 ± 0.0211, specificity of 0.9124 ± 0.0308, recall of 0.8597 ± 0.0190, F1-score of 0.8829 ± 0.0215 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9443 ± 0.0276 (95% confidence interval: 0.9210-0.9620) for GS screening, which was significantly higher than that achieved by human experts. This study highlighted the feasibility of facial recognition technology for GSs identification. The VGG-16 recognition model can play a prominent role in GSs screening in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 23 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,816,962
of 24,833,726 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,548
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,288
of 424,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#39
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,726 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.