You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemiological investigation of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01976-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuyan Yao, Yini Wang, Yuan Sun, Li Liu, Rui Zhang, Jianpei Fang, Runming Jin, Jie Yu, Fei Li, Jie Bai, Yun Zeng, Cheng Zhang, Huo Tan, Fan Zhou, Yan Chen, Qiaohua Zhang, Zhao Wang |
| Abstract |
Currently, most research on hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) have focused on etiology and therapy, leaving few epidemiological reports. The published studies of China are mainly regional investigations. We aimed to present the overall epidemiological status of HLH in China, and provide Chinese data for the international HLH epidemiological investigation. The data of HLH cases in China in 2019 were collected and statistically analyzed. Epstein-Barr virus accounted for 44.01% of the 1445 cases in 31 regions and was the most common cause. Lymphoma-associated HLH patients were more often male (P < 0.05) while rheumatic and immune-associated HLH were more often female (P < 0.001). Primary HLH and Epstein-Barr Virus-associated HLH were predominant in children (P < 0.001) while tumor-associated HLH was predominant in adults. Lymphoma-associated HLH was positively correlated with the age of onset (P < 0.01). The diagnosis rate of 29 areas had a significant correlation with per capita Gross domestic product (P < 0.05). The different distribution of HLH etiology by age and gender contributes to the diagnosis of HLH by clinicians; The suboptimal diagnosis rate in regions with a high incidence of HLH in China is a result of the effect of the local economic level indicating the importance of improving the regional medical level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,518
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,355
of 432,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#97
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.