↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of spatial metal accumulation patterns in Noccaea caerulescens by X-ray fluorescence image processing for genetic studies

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of spatial metal accumulation patterns in Noccaea caerulescens by X-ray fluorescence image processing for genetic studies
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13007-021-00784-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas van der Zee, Amelia Corzo Remigio, Lachlan W. Casey, Imam Purwadi, Jitpanu Yamjabok, Antony van der Ent, Gert Kootstra, Mark G. M. Aarts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#11,121,709
of 20,303,071 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#464
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,775
of 338,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,303,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them