You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dexamethasone and tocilizumab treatment considerably reduces the value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to detect secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03717-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J. Kooistra, Miranda van Berkel, Noortje F. van Kempen, Celine R. M. van Latum, Niklas Bruse, Tim Frenzel, Maarten J. W. van den Berg, Jeroen A. Schouten, Matthijs Kox, Peter Pickkers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 18% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#665,605
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#453
of 6,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,525
of 438,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.