You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analysis of carotenoid accumulation in two goji (Lycium barbarum L. and L. ruthenicumMurr.) fruits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12870-014-0269-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yongliang Liu, Shaohua Zeng, Wei Sun, Min Wu, Weiming Hu, Xiaofei Shen, Ying Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#645
of 3,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,072
of 357,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#28
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.