You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization among beneficiaries in China’s new cooperative medical scheme
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11573-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dian Luo, Jing Deng, Edmund R. Becker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,588,546
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,938
of 15,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,652
of 431,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#180
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.