↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: European registry of type A aortic dissection (ERTAAD) - rationale, design and definition criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: European registry of type A aortic dissection (ERTAAD) - rationale, design and definition criteria
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13019-021-01606-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fausto Biancari, Giovanni Mariscalco, Hakeem Yusuff, Geoffrey Tsang, Suvitesh Luthra, Francesco Onorati, Alessandra Francica, Cecilia Rossetti, Andrea Perrotti, Sidney Chocron, Antonio Fiore, Thierry Folliguet, Matteo Pettinari, Angelo M. Dell’Aquila, Till Demal, Lenard Conradi, Christian Detter, Marek Pol, Peter Ivak, Filip Schlosser, Stefano Forlani, Govind Chetty, Amer Harky, Manoj Kuduvalli, Mark Field, Igor Vendramin, Ugolino Livi, Mauro Rinaldi, Luisa Ferrante, Christian Etz, Thilo Noack, Stefano Mastrobuoni, Laurent De Kerchove, Mikko Jormalainen, Steven Laga, Bart Meuris, Marc Schepens, Zein El Dean, Antti Vento, Peter Raivio, Michael Borger, Tatu Juvonen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#407
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,026
of 431,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#17
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.