You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of baseline beta-blocker use on inotrope response and clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock: a subgroup analysis of the DOREMI trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03706-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pietro Di Santo, Rebecca Mathew, Richard G. Jung, Trevor Simard, Stephanie Skanes, Brennan Mao, F. Daniel Ramirez, Jeffrey A. Marbach, Omar Abdel-Razek, Pouya Motazedian, Simon Parlow, Kevin E. Boczar, Gianni D’Egidio, Steven Hawken, Jordan Bernick, George A. Wells, Alexander Dick, Derek Y. So, Christopher Glover, Juan J. Russo, Caroline McGuinty, Benjamin Hibbert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Singapore | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
Scientists | 5 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 44% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,580,921
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,387
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,499
of 436,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.