↓ Skip to main content

Impact of baseline beta-blocker use on inotrope response and clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock: a subgroup analysis of the DOREMI trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of baseline beta-blocker use on inotrope response and clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock: a subgroup analysis of the DOREMI trial
Published in
Critical Care, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03706-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pietro Di Santo, Rebecca Mathew, Richard G. Jung, Trevor Simard, Stephanie Skanes, Brennan Mao, F. Daniel Ramirez, Jeffrey A. Marbach, Omar Abdel-Razek, Pouya Motazedian, Simon Parlow, Kevin E. Boczar, Gianni D’Egidio, Steven Hawken, Jordan Bernick, George A. Wells, Alexander Dick, Derek Y. So, Christopher Glover, Juan J. Russo, Caroline McGuinty, Benjamin Hibbert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,580,921
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,387
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,499
of 436,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.