↓ Skip to main content

Delimiting genetic units in Neotropical toads under incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delimiting genetic units in Neotropical toads under incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Tereza C Thomé, Kelly R Zamudio, Célio F B Haddad, João Alexandrino

Abstract

Delimiting genetic units is useful to enhance taxonomic discovery and is often the first step toward understanding evolutionary mechanisms generating diversification. The six species within the Rhinella crucifer group of toads were defined under morphological criteria alone. Previous data suggest limited correspondence of these species to mitochondrial lineages, and morphological intergradation at transitions between forms suggests hybridization. Here we extensively sampled populations throughout the geographic distribution of the group and analyzed mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data to delimit genetic units using tree-based and allele frequency-based approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 8%
Germany 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 118 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 19 14%
Professor 10 8%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 78%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 8 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,578
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,921
of 286,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.