↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of using amyloid positron emission tomography in individuals with mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of using amyloid positron emission tomography in individuals with mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12962-021-00300-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young-Sil Lee, HyunChul Youn, Hyun-Ghang Jeong, Tae-Jin Lee, Ji Won Han, Joon Hyuk Park, Ki Woong Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 17 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Unspecified 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,779,795
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#55
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,935
of 430,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.