↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study addressing the importance of work and other everyday activities for well-being among people with mental illness: does additional vulnerability matter?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study addressing the importance of work and other everyday activities for well-being among people with mental illness: does additional vulnerability matter?
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12888-021-03388-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Eklund, A. Birgitta Gunnarsson, Jan-Åke Jansson, Parvin Pooremamali, Mona Eklund

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 34 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 35 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,937,502
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,497
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,628
of 435,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#27
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.