You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: A lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1072 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ellen van Kleef, Kai Otten, Hans CM van Trijp |
Abstract |
The essence of nudging is to adapt the environment in which consumers make decisions to help them make better choices, without forcing certain outcomes upon them. To determine how consumers can effectively be guided to select healthier snacks, we examine the effect of manipulating the assortment structure and shelf layout of an impulse display including both healthy and unhealthy snacks near the checkout counter of a canteen. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
United States | 4 | 15% |
Australia | 3 | 12% |
Netherlands | 3 | 12% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 335 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 68 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 62 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 13% |
Researcher | 34 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Other | 44 | 13% |
Unknown | 75 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 41 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 30 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 7% |
Other | 87 | 26% |
Unknown | 93 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#511,958
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#482
of 17,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,434
of 287,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.