You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient–ventilator asynchrony, impact on clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-021-00565-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michihito Kyo, Tatsutoshi Shimatani, Koji Hosokawa, Shunsuke Taito, Yuki Kataoka, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Nobuaki Shime |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 10 | 16% |
| Colombia | 8 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Chile | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,100,509
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#41
of 582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,644
of 421,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.