You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Body circumferences: clinical implications emerging from a new geometric model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-5-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven B Heymsfield, Allison Martin-Nguyen, Tung M Fong, Dympna Gallagher, Angelo Pietrobelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,348,274
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#263
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,752
of 90,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.