You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12940-021-00771-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin L. Soskolne, Shira Kramer, Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla, Daniele Mandrioli, Jennifer Sass, Michael Gochfeld, Carl F. Cranor, Shailesh Advani, Lisa A. Bero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,439,113
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#595
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,085
of 437,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.