You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous renal replacement therapy in COVID-19—associated AKI: adding heparin to citrate to extend filter life—a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03729-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo de Oliveira Valle, Carla Paulina Sandoval Cabrera, Claudia Coimbra César de Albuquerque, Giovanio Vieira da Silva, Márcia Fernanda Arantes de Oliveira, Gabriel Teixeira Montezuma Sales, Igor Smolentzov, Bernardo Vergara Reichert, Lucia Andrade, Victor Faria Seabra, Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins, Camila Eleuterio Rodrigues |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,782,725
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,576
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,900
of 436,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#44
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.