You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Ichikado CT score as a prognostic tool for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-021-00566-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan Araiza, Melanie Duran, Cesar Patiño, Paul E. Marik, Joseph Varon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Mexico | 1 | 11% |
Japan | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 19% |
Engineering | 4 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,458,103
of 23,508,556 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#71
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,609
of 432,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.