↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Arthritis Research, January 2000
DOI 10.1186/ar66
Authors

Robert A Ortmann, Tammy Cheng, Roberta Visconti, David M Frucht, John J O'Shea

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 37%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Chemistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,417,527
of 19,790,383 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research
#54
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,284
of 336,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,790,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them