↓ Skip to main content

Obstructive sleep apnea increases the risk of cardiovascular damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging studies

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obstructive sleep apnea increases the risk of cardiovascular damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging studies
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01759-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mi Lu, Zhenjia Wang, Xiaojun Zhan, Yongxiang Wei

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 52%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#17,614,897
of 22,610,790 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,685
of 1,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,325
of 344,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,610,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them