↓ Skip to main content

Innovation in patient-centered care: lessons from a qualitative study of innovative health care organizations in Washington State

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Innovation in patient-centered care: lessons from a qualitative study of innovative health care organizations in Washington State
Published in
BMC Primary Care, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Reed, Douglas A Conrad, Susan E Hernandez, Carolyn Watts, Miriam Marcus-Smith

Abstract

Growing interest in the promise of patient-centered care has led to numerous health care innovations, including the patient-centered medical home, shared decision-making, and payment reforms. How best to vet and adopt innovations is an open question. Washington State has been a leader in health care reform and is a rich laboratory for patient-centered innovations. We sought to understand the process of patient-centered care innovation undertaken by innovative health care organizations - from strategic planning to goal selection to implementation to maintenance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 17%
Social Sciences 29 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 7%
Psychology 10 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 42 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,645,596
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#646
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,468
of 286,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.