You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of the electrokinetic charge of neurotrophis-based nanocarriers: protein distribution, toxicity, and oxidative stress in in vitro setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-00984-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Dąbkowska, Zofia Ulańczyk, Karolina Łuczkowska, Dorota Rogińska, Anna Sobuś, Monika Wasilewska, Maria Olszewska, Katarzyna Jakubowska, Bogusław Machaliński |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#814
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,961
of 430,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#49
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.