You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adolescent pregnancies and girls' sexual and reproductive rights in the amazon basin of Ecuador: an analysis of providers' and policy makers' discourses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-10-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Goicolea, Marianne Wulff, Miguel San Sebastian, Ann Öhman |
| Abstract |
Adolescent pregnancies are a common phenomenon that can have both positive and negative consequences. The rights framework allows us to explore adolescent pregnancies not just as isolated events, but in relation to girls' sexual and reproductive freedom and their entitlement to a system of health protection that includes both health services and the so called social determinants of health. The aim of this study was to explore policy makers' and service providers' discourses concerning adolescent pregnancies, and discuss the consequences that those discourses have for the exercise of girls' sexual and reproductive rights' in the province of Orellana, located in the amazon basin of Ecuador. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 24% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Psychology | 16 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#16,437
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,113
of 104,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.