↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian JZ Prokopetz, Elena Losina, Robin L Bliss, John Wright, John A Baron, Jeffrey N Katz

Abstract

Numerous papers have been published examining risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but there have been no comprehensive systematic literature reviews that summarize the most recent findings across a broad range of potential predictors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 55 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 43%
Engineering 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 62 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,842,877
of 23,597,497 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,961
of 4,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,177
of 283,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#45
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,597,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.