You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
To prone or not to prone ARDS patients on ECMO
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03675-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oriol Roca, Andrés Pacheco, Marina García-de-Acilu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 14% |
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| Mexico | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Poland | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#785,569
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#571
of 6,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,799
of 434,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#19
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.