You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12987-020-00201-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Canac, Kian Jalaleddini, Samuel G. Thorpe, Corey M. Thibeault, Robert B. Hamilton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 115 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 7% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 119 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#142
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,951
of 400,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.